Ad Spot

WITT: It matters who nominates, affirms SCOTUS justices

Only a small percentage of voters ever consider the importance of potential events affecting the Supreme Court when presidential elections come up.

But, because of the unlimited tenure of justices, the choice for president — and his or her obligation to appoint justices — has huge ramifications far outlasting the succeeding four or eight years during which the elected president might hold office.

Our constitution was pretty vague regarding the Supreme Court, simply stating, in Article III: “The Judges, both of the supreme (supreme was not capitalized therein) and inferior courts shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour…”. Article II, Section 2 delegates to the Senate the right of confirmation of nominees to the court.

The number of justices was not stipulated and has varied during the more than 200 years that the nation has existed. 

But in 1869, by means of the Judiciary Act of that year, the number was established as nine, and it has remained thus since that time. The last time an attempt was made to change the number of justices was in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt attempted to appoint additional justices.

The number can be changed by a simple act, approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate and signed by the president.

There are at least a couple of things relating to Supreme Court justices that should be accepted.

One, each president, regardless of party, has the stipulated right to nominate, during the period he or she holds office, persons for a seat on the court. 

It is quite obvious that presidents of both major parties have made such nominations, and while those seated justices have been both liberal and conservative, the continuity of the court goes on, often changing previous findings and setting new courses for the American populace.

Repeal of Prohibition and voting rights for women are examples of both.

While political parties not holding a majority in the Senate almost invariably try to stymie appointments of the opposing party, these efforts are almost always a result of pure political pandering and often have little to do with any demonstrated ability or professionalism of the nominee.

Two, it is expecting something that never was and will never be to expect a Supreme Court justice to totally abandon his or her strongly held religious or ethical beliefs when making judgments on cases before the court. 

Justices are no less human than anyone else, and it should be expected that their rulings will always, to some degree, reflect themselves, even if their personal beliefs change during the time they hold a seat on the court.

Here’s the bottom line. Presidents have the authority to nominate justices. The Senate has the responsibility to affirm or deny those nominees and it should be done expeditiously regardless of who the president may be or who controls the Senate.

Some justices have framed themselves as “originalists” believing that the constitution is immutable. It should be recognized that our founders were not especially adept at prognosticating the future of this country otherwise there would not now be 27 Amendments to the document. 

Even the Bill of Rights was added after the adoption of the original document. So justices should not think that the constitution will always be totally applicable to the norms of the current society.

Let there be no mistake, decisions handed down by the court can, and often do, have ramifications at the local level.

Kim Davis, former county clerk in Carter County, had a case pending before the court, and it was denied hearing, and a decision by the court a couple of years ago resulted in modifications to the sign ordinance of Clark County.

It matters who sits, who nominates and who affirms.

 

Chuck Witt is a retired architect and a lifelong resident of Winchester. He can be reached at chuck740@bellsouth.net.

News

Marsy’s Law intended to protect victims’ rights

News

Developer proposes small home project

Clark County

Hydrant flushing continues

Clark County

Principals share plans for return to in-person classes

Public Records

Property transfers for Oct. 12-17, 2020

Public Records

Police and fire reports for Oct. 22, 2020

Public Records

Marriage licenses for Oct. 12-17, 2020

Clark County

Clark records 11th COVID death

Clark County

Education in a pandemic: School board candidates share their thoughts

Clark County

State rep candidates split on future of Clark development

Clark County

Jeff Kerr remembered as talented journalist

News

City looking for firefighters, EMS staff

News

Work begins on sidewalk repairs in downtown

Clark County

Commission candidates discuss community, growth plans during virtual forum

Clark County

Clark unemployment still high compared to 2019 rates

Clark County

Clark tops 500 COVID cases as state continues to see record-breaking numbers

Clark County

More families get free food from USDA

Clark County

Art & justice: Quilting project raises awareness of teens’ social justice concerns

Clark County

‘The time is now:’ School employee makes plea for new preschool building at public hearing

Clark County

Former WPD chief passes away, remembered for high standards for officers

News

Citywide leaf collection to begin Nov. 2

News

WMU continues hydrant flushings

Clark County

Clark man jailed for assault, burglary

Public Records

Police and fire reports for Oct. 20, 2020